eor: (Renton gun)
So I just read about a study of attraction. The methodology was based on speed dating, where the participants get 3 minutes to talk to each person of the opposite gender before a bell rings and they go on to the next. Is it just me or does that seem a ludicrous way to test anything beyond the attractiveness of certain physical attributes? Three minutes! If you're as slow moving as I am you couldn't even find out if she/he had a pulse in that amount of time!

The people doing the survey note that the males in the survey seemed to pick based entirely on looks even though their stated criteria for mates involved other things. Hello, three minutes! It's not like they got into a good discussion of the symbolism of "The Canticle of Leibowitz", whether the ending of the "Handmaid's Tale" was hopeful or hopeless, or what would morally based international monetary policy look like. If anyone can see someone else's soul in three minutes they have a truly rare gift.

You get paid for this shit? Where did you get your doctorate a cracker jack box? I know, you wanted something you could finish in an afternoon and spend a couple months at the pub, compiling the results.

(If you want the original reference I think it was on CNN, but there really wasn't much to it. It's probably an old article they dredged back up.)

"I want to be a lawyer.
I want to be a scholar.
But I really can't be bothered,
just gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme." - Kate Bush "Sat in Your Lap"

ETA: Wait, why didn't I quote The Bloodhound Gang. Oh, wait, for a brief moment I had taste. Don't worry it passed.
eor: (Harold)
I have been following the recent uproar here as a spectator. Hell, most of us were spectators when it comes right down to it.

What amazed me was not the stupidity of a corporate entity, that wasn't surprising at all. I've seen too much corporate stupidity to be surprised by something as run of the mill as this was.

No, I was amazed by the self-destructiveness of the community at large. Let's face it, when it comes to journalling there are plenty of sites out there. Many of them are better adapted to writing, or pictures, or a host of other things. The value in LJ is not the software, the interface, or the history. The value of LJ is the ability to interact with the people who are there: the community. Taking your ball and going home allows you to have your one little page, which people may or may not remember to visit. But being able to pop open the f-list is of value. Really, it's the only thing of value unique to LJ. If you try to transplant that it will die.

That said, because I like my content to be my content, not someone else's, I made a tool which makes mirgration fairly simple. For a proof of concept see here. The migration process has some caveats so I'm not going to throw my meager code out for the world to tear apart. I would consider moving the content of friends even though I don't favor a mass migration off of LJ. Life being what it is, comments can't be reasonably moved. I am working on another tool that does the same kind of thing for comments, but the output of that would be a static HTML page.

"Yes, it's bread that we fight for,
but we fight for roses too."

Profile

eor: (Default)
eor

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 10:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios