Jan. 8th, 2002

eor: (Default)
Eli Lilly is getting ready to release a product that relieves all those unpleasant emotional things associated with PMS. Now to get an understanding of the product you have to realize they've simply painted their winning SSRI antidepressant product, Prozac, pink. It's fortunate for we the people that Lilly has been working so hard on this product. So fortunate that this will be released to the market just as the patent protection for best selling Prozac expires. They were going to release a once a week version of Prozac too, but that may have been scuttled by lawsuits (see below), so only women will get the added benefits of this great product.

But before we begin the dancing in the streets, let's peruse some stats. I'm sorry about the sketchy nature of these, but it can be hard to find comparative stats for different years. Also let me express here - depression is a serious disorder, deadly serious. I wouldn't write about it if I didn't think so.

*****

18.8 million American adults have a depressive disorder each year (this includes bipolar, chronic mild depression and major depression)(NIMH stat) There around 281 million people in the US as of 2000.(US Census Bureau) That puts about 7% of the population of the US in a notably unenviable place each year.

The best data I've been able to find so far is that in 1994, 21 million prescriptions for anti-depressants were written. In 1998, 65 million prescriptions were written for anti-depressants. In 2000, 73.3 million prescriptions were written for just the top 3 SSRI antidepressants, worth 6.5 billion dollars. (Kaiser Family Foundation Prescription Drug Chartbook) Again, the data aren't similar, the 2000 data are only for the 3 most popular, the other two years are total but not from well documented sources. Even discounting the data a bit, that trend is amazing. Compare that to the number of people suffering depression each year.

In 1994, 3,000 prescriptions for Prozac were written for children younger than one year old. Wow, just think of a one year old with chronic depression or maybe the reason for the prescription was severe depression. Somehow the child managed to express there recurrent suicidal thoughts and the fact that their depression was affecting their job performance. Maybe crib death is really just suicide in disguise.

Early studies suggested sexual disfunction was a side effect in <10% of patients. Those studies didn't ask the patients if they had sexual disfunction, they only recorded it if the patient complained (nice trick Eli). Later studies which actually asked the question found between 50 and 70% of patients had some degree of sexual disfunction ranging from decreased libido to delayed or non-existent orgasm. Oh and twice as many women take these things as men. A little self centered of me I'll admit but what the hell are they trying to do to my chances at bars!

In 1994, there were l,908,000 patients admitted to psychiatric hospitals in the United States. Of that number 8% were admitted with a diagnosis of SSRI induced psychosis.(Clinical Psychiatry News) Okay so that last one may be a little inflamatory. Afterall, if they were out of control, went on meds, swung back the other way out of control, then got admitted it would show up as SSRI induced psychosis. But we're talking about anti-depressants, anti-psychotics are the next aisle over. In the depressed/anti-depressed world you'd expect a bit of mania for your swing, psychosis is an altogether different bird.

Oh, the last side effect we'll cover today is being debated in court. Lilly denies in one place (court) and admits in another (the patent for the new Prozac) that Prozac causes... well, suicidal tendencies and some other nastiness. Now it's debatable whether it really causes the suicidal tendencies or just gives people, who were too depressed to act, the energy to actually do something unfortunate. But Lilly was dumb enough to say it did in a patent, so I guess it does.

*****

Enough of the random things, if you want to go crazy sometime, try to find clear consistent meaningful data on how many citizens of the United States are currently taking anti-depressants. That's the question I started with and still haven't gotten an answer.

Why do I care? Well, maybe I wouldn't care if I knew anyone who had been on anti-depressants and actually come off of them. That's the catch isn't it, when do you stop? Do you personally know anyone who used to be on SSRIs and isn't now? The recommendations are to keep taking it after you feel better (4-6 months). Although there is no clinical addiction, withdrawl symptoms include nausea, dizziness, and other minor physical ailments. As for the mental effects of withdrawl, again, no clinical addiction there, but put people who have suffered major depressions before into just a little bit of a spiral as they come off... they'll be back.

William S. Burroughs talked about the perfect drug in his book "Naked Lunch". I'm sure he was psychotic, but maybe he was psychic too. His perfect drug was a drug that has the ability to remove your troubles, easy to dispense, without obvious side effects and what makes it perfect from the dealer's persepective is a good solid addictive quality. Mr. Burroughs understood from experience that most of the addictive street drugs weren't very physically addictive, but were psychologically addictive. Mental Note: check estate of WSB for ownership of stock in ELI.

Now, for major depression (as defined by NIMH and others) or chronic depression (ditto) I think we should use whatever means possible to return the sufferers to the land of the okay. As I said, this is a serious problem and needs to be dealt with seriously. It is a physician's responsibility *not* to give everyone a lifetime supply like the Easter Bunny giving out jelly beans.
eor: (Default)
"There is unrest in the forest,
there is trouble with the trees.
The maples want more sunlight,
and the oaks ignore their pleas."
Rush "Trees"

Hey, boys and girls lets talk about music for a moment. Not making of music, but selling of music. A few weeks ago Elton John, that utterly successful music icon, announced he wasn't going to release another album. He said he liked playing music for people, but basically the industry sucked so bad he couldn't stand it anymore. Think about this, Elton John! If anyone has clout and power with the record companies you'd think the Pinball Wizard would be able to write his own ticket. Remember, we're talking about a guy who can easily fill Wembley.

I guess after raping artists and ripping off fans for years the record industry might just start getting it from both ends now.

On one side, fans with Napster and recordable CD's. Yes, Napster is dead, but the technology is marching much faster than the large companies can crawl. The DVD encryption standard was broken by a couple of students before it was officially released. Don't think the next scheme won't be turned to swiss cheese by smart people and distributed systems. In the digital age redistribution is a piece of cake.

On the other side are artists. These folks do the work, play bars, and starve for years. Then someone has them sign a contract, makes them famous, and gives them $.02 per CD sold. The artists then get to go out and tour (which with merchandising is where they actually make their money) and promote the album so the big company makes more on sales. But the times they are a changing. Now artists can and are releasing songs without the record company. They can stick an mp3 on their web page and give it away for free. It doesn't cost them much, because people will still show up at the concerts to see them.

Oh, but if you're an artist don't yell too loud. Michele Shocked made the mistake of taking on her label and ended up after many years in court suing them for slavery. She won. Of course, after that none of the music outlets could find her name in their databases. I had the poor bewildered 19 year old at Tower searching for about 10 minutes. Funny, Tower has everything, but they had no history of a woman with 5 albums out.

Now there is a copyright law. There are also laws against monopoly, unfair trade practicies, and deceptive advertising. The moral high ground is mighty hard to find in this one. Start looking at who owns what in the entertainment industry, who's publishing reviews of who, etc. There's more competition in my Friday night date slot than there is in the music industry and that's not a positive statement of my social prowess.

Oh, one final bit. Didn't Metallica have an album "Master of Puppets"? Funny really that Metallica went after Napster. Afterall they don't make much off CD's. They're actually better off if a new fan buys a concert ticket or a T-shirt as a result of an mp3 download. Can you say, "Puppets?" I knew you could.

Profile

eor: (Default)
eor

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 18th, 2025 07:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios